Mythril Tutorial: Smart Contract Security Analysis

Smart contract security is a critical concern in the blockchain ecosystem, where even minor vulnerabilities can lead to significant financial losses. One of the most powerful tools for detecting such vulnerabilities is Mythril, an open-source security analysis tool for Ethereum smart contracts. In this comprehensive guide, we’ll walk through installing and using Mythril, understanding its core mechanics, and leveraging key modules like Ether Thief and Suicide to uncover hidden flaws in Solidity code.

Whether you're a developer, auditor, or blockchain enthusiast, mastering Mythril empowers you to proactively identify risks before deployment. Let’s dive into how this symbolic execution-based analyzer works and how you can integrate it into your security workflow.

Installing the Mythril Security Analysis Tool

To get started with Mythril, ensure your environment has Python and pip installed. Then run the following command:

pip install mythril

After installation, verify the version to confirm compatibility (you should have at least v0.21.7):

myth version

You’ll see output similar to:

Mythril version v0.21.15

Once confirmed, you’re ready to begin analyzing contracts. The basic command syntax is:

myth analyze

For example:

myth analyze tokensale.sol
myth analyze -a

Without additional parameters, myth analyze performs a general security scan suitable for most use cases.

👉 Discover how advanced security tools can protect your blockchain projects today.

How Mythril Works: Symbolic Execution Explained

Mythril operates by executing Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) bytecode within a controlled environment using symbolic execution—a technique that explores multiple execution paths by treating inputs as symbolic variables rather than concrete values.

The analysis process follows these steps:

Extract contract bytecode from source code or on-chain deployment.
Initialize contract state, including storage and balance.
Simulate up to n transactions, where n defaults to 2 but can be adjusted.
Analyze reachable states under various assumptions to prove or disprove vulnerability existence.

When a dangerous state—such as unauthorized fund withdrawal—is found, Mythril generates the exact transaction sequence needed to reach it. This not only confirms exploitability but also aids in debugging and remediation.

Basic Usage: Analyzing a Vulnerable Token Sale Contract

Let’s apply Mythril to a real-world scenario. Consider TokenSale, a simple contract allowing users to buy and sell tokens. Save the following Solidity code as tokensale.sol:

contract TokenSale {
    mapping (address => uint) public balances;
    uint public PRICE_PER_TOKEN = 1 ether;

    function buy(uint256 numTokens) public payable {
        require(msg.value == numTokens * PRICE_PER_TOKEN);
        balances[msg.sender] += numTokens;
    }

    function sell(uint256 numTokens) public {
        require(balances[msg.sender] >= numTokens);
        msg.sender.transfer(numTokens * PRICE_PER_TOKEN);
        balances[msg.sender] -= numTokens;
    }
}

Run the analysis using the Ether Thief module:

myth analyze -m ether_thief tokensale.sol

You’ll receive a report indicating a high-severity issue:

==== Unprotected Ether Withdrawal ====
SWC ID: 105
Severity: High
Function name: sell(uint256)
msg.sender.transfer(numTokens * PRICE_PER_TOKEN)

This flags a potential ether leak. But where’s the root cause?

Detecting Ether Leaks with the Ether Thief Module

The Ether Thief module identifies sequences allowing unauthorized withdrawal of funds from a contract. It specifically looks for conditions where:

A non-owner account withdraws ether,
The amount exceeds their prior contributions,
Or they never deposited any ether at all.

In our TokenSale example, the vulnerability lies in an integer overflow within the buy() function:

require(msg.value == numTokens * PRICE_PER_TOKEN);

If an attacker passes an extremely large numTokens value—such as 0x2000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000—the multiplication overflows, resulting in msg.value == 0. The condition passes, granting massive token balances without payment.

Mythril automatically computes this exploit value and includes it in the transaction trace:

Transaction Sequence:
Caller: [CREATOR], data: [CONTRACT CREATION], value: 1 ETH
Caller: [ATTACKER], data: 0xd96a..., value: 0x0
Caller: [ATTACKER], data: 0xe484..., value: 0x0

The second call to sell() then allows draining the contract.

👉 Learn how proactive contract auditing prevents costly exploits.

Expanding Analysis Depth: Configuring Transaction Count

By default, Mythril simulates two transactions (-t 2). While sufficient for many bugs, deeper attack paths may require more steps.

Consider a contract named Killme with a backdoor:

contract Killme {
    address public owner;
    bytes11 private password = "cryptokittyt";

    function activePassword(bytes11 pass) public {
        if (pass == password) owner = msg.sender;
    }

    function pwnContract() public {
        owner = msg.sender;
    }

    function kill() public {
        require(msg.sender == owner);
        selfdestruct(msg.sender);
    }
}

Running myth analyze killme.sol returns no issues—because killing the contract requires three transactions:

Call activePassword("cryptokittyt") to become owner,
Or call pwnContract() directly if possible,
Then invoke kill().

Use the -t flag to increase depth:

myth analyze killme.sol -t3

Now Mythril detects the vulnerability:

==== Unprotected Selfdestruct ====
Function name: kill()
selfdestruct(msg.sender)

With three transactions simulated, the full exploit path emerges.

Managing Execution Time with Timeout Settings

Complex contracts may take too long to analyze exhaustively. To manage runtime, use the --execution-timeout parameter (in seconds). For example, limit analysis to 10 minutes:

myth analyze --execution-timeout 600 -t2 -m ether_thief,suicide -c [WALLETLIBRARY-BYTECODE]

Even if interrupted, Mythril outputs all findings up to that point—making it ideal for large-scale audits.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q: What is symbolic execution in smart contract analysis?
A: Symbolic execution treats inputs as symbols instead of fixed values, enabling exploration of multiple code paths and uncovering edge-case vulnerabilities that traditional testing might miss.

Q: Can Mythril analyze deployed contracts without source code?
A: Yes. Mythril supports analysis via bytecode alone, though having source code improves readability by mapping issues directly to lines of Solidity.

Q: Is Mythril suitable for production security audits?
A: While Mythril is powerful, it should complement—not replace—manual review and other tools like Slither or static analyzers for comprehensive coverage.

Q: How do I interpret transaction sequences in Mythril reports?
A: Each entry shows caller, function data, and ether value. Exploit sequences reveal how attackers interact with the contract step-by-step.

Q: Does Mythril support custom vulnerability modules?
A: Yes, developers can write and integrate custom analysis modules to detect project-specific risks.

Q: Why didn’t Mythril find a vulnerability in my contract?
A: False negatives can occur due to limited transaction depth (-t), timeout settings, or complex logic. Always adjust parameters and cross-validate results.

Core Keywords:

Mythril tutorial, smart contract security, Ethereum vulnerability detection, symbolic execution, Ether Thief module, Suicide module, Mythril analyze command, integer overflow exploit

👉 Explore secure blockchain development practices with trusted tools and insights.