The internet loves a good irony-filled comeback, especially when it involves someone confidently dismissing an idea—only for time to prove them spectacularly wrong. One such viral moment in crypto history is the now-infamous quote: “Give me Bitcoin, I won’t take it.” This phrase has become more than just a soundbite—it's a cultural meme, a cautionary tale, and a symbol of how quickly public opinion can shift in the fast-moving world of digital assets.
But where did it come from? And why does it still resonate today?
The Origin: A 2014 Episode of Caijing Langyan
The quote traces back to January 27, 2014, during an episode of the Chinese financial talk show Caijing Langyan (translated as Financial Lang Eye), hosted by economist Lang Xiping (also known as Larry Lang). At the time, Bitcoin was still largely misunderstood by mainstream audiences—valued around $800 but far from household recognition.
During a segment titled The Truth About Bitcoin, Lang was asked a simple question:
“If someone gave you 100 Bitcoins, would you accept them?”
Without hesitation, he waved his hands dismissively and replied:
“You give me Bitcoin? I won’t take it!”
He doubled down when pressed:
“Really, you wouldn’t take it?”
“Of course not.”
That moment, captured on camera, became legendary—not for its insight, but for its timing. In hindsight, those 100 Bitcoins could have been worth millions just a few years later.
👉 Discover why so many people regret not getting into digital assets earlier.
Why Did He Say That?
Lang Xiping’s skepticism wasn’t unique. Back in 2014, many traditional economists and financial experts viewed Bitcoin with suspicion or outright disdain. His reasoning reflected common concerns at the time:
- Lack of intrinsic value: Unlike gold or real estate, Bitcoin isn’t tied to physical assets.
- No government backing: It wasn’t issued or regulated by any central authority.
- Volatility and risk: Early price swings made it seem like a speculative bubble.
- Cultural preference for tangible wealth: As Lang put it, “Look at antiques—things with history. Or gold and silver—you can wear them, they shine, and in war, they don’t break.”
These arguments made sense to many then. After all, who would trust a currency that exists only online?
Yet what Lang—and others—underestimated was Bitcoin’s core innovation: decentralized trust through blockchain technology. What seemed “virtual” was actually secured by complex cryptography and global consensus.
From Skepticism to Symbolism
Fast forward to today, and that one clip has taken on a life of its own.
Every time Bitcoin surges—whether hitting $20,000, $60,000, or approaching six-figure valuations—the meme resurfaces across social media platforms. Crypto enthusiasts share screenshots of Lang’s statement with captions like:
“This is what happens when you don’t believe in digital scarcity.”
“Missed opportunity of a lifetime.”
“The ultimate ‘I told you so’ moment.”
It’s no longer just about Lang Xiping; it represents anyone who underestimated the potential of cryptocurrencies. Whether due to fear, misunderstanding, or ideological resistance, this quote has become shorthand for being on the wrong side of technological disruption.
The Broader Context: Early Reactions to Bitcoin
Lang wasn’t alone. Many respected figures once dismissed Bitcoin:
- Warren Buffett called it “rat poison squared.”
- Nouriel Roubini, the economist known for predicting the 2008 crash, labeled it a scam.
- Mainstream media outlets ran headlines calling Bitcoin a fad or a tool for criminals.
But over time, reality shifted. Bitcoin survived hacks, bans, crashes, and regulatory scrutiny. It proved resilient. And more importantly, it introduced the world to concepts like decentralized finance (DeFi), smart contracts, and tokenized assets.
Now, institutions like MicroStrategy, Tesla (at one point), and even central banks are exploring digital currencies.
👉 See how modern investors are navigating the new era of digital finance.
Core Keywords in Context
This story naturally ties into several key themes in the crypto space:
- Bitcoin adoption
- Cryptocurrency skepticism
- Digital asset investment
- Blockchain technology
- Financial innovation
- Market cycles
- Economic forecasting
- Crypto education
These keywords reflect both the historical debate and ongoing evolution of how society views money in the digital age.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q: How much would 100 Bitcoins be worth today?
As of early 2025, with Bitcoin trading near $60,000, 100 BTC would be worth approximately **$6 million**. Even accounting for market fluctuations, this highlights the dramatic growth since 2014.
Q: Has Lang Xiping changed his stance on Bitcoin?
There is no public record of Lang Xiping retracting or significantly revising his position. He remains a critic of speculative assets and has continued to advocate for traditional investment models.
Q: Was Bitcoin really worthless in 2014?
Not technically. While adoption was low, Bitcoin had already demonstrated utility: Silk Road transactions (before shutdown), remittances, darknet markets, and early tech adopters were actively using it. Its value was speculative but rooted in real technological innovation.
Q: Why do people still talk about this quote?
Because it encapsulates the clash between old-world economics and new-world technology. It serves as both humor and warning: dismissing innovation too quickly can come at a cost.
Q: Could something similar happen again with new cryptocurrencies?
Absolutely. History often repeats itself. Just as Bitcoin was mocked early on, newer technologies like decentralized identity, Web3 apps, or privacy coins face similar skepticism today.
Q: Is it too late to invest in Bitcoin now?
While early adopters reaped massive gains, many experts argue we’re still in the early stages of institutional adoption. With developments like Bitcoin ETFs and global payment integrations, the long-term narrative remains strong.
👉 Learn how to start building your own digital asset portfolio today.
Final Thoughts: Lessons from a Meme
The “Give me Bitcoin, I won’t take it” moment is more than internet fodder—it’s a lesson in humility, open-mindedness, and the unpredictable nature of technological progress.
It reminds us that:
- Disruption rarely arrives with fanfare—it often starts quietly, misunderstood and undervalued.
- Confidence without curiosity can lead to missed opportunities.
- True financial literacy includes understanding emerging trends, even if they challenge tradition.
Whether you’re bullish on crypto or still skeptical, one thing is clear: the conversation around money has changed forever.
And next time someone confidently dismisses a new technology—remember Lang Xiping’s hands waving “no thanks” to 100 Bitcoins. The future belongs to those willing to learn, adapt, and explore.